8.00 - 9:00
Registration & Badge Pickup
Conferences desk
9.00 - 9:15
Opening
Blauwe Zaal
9.15 - 10:15
Keynote by Raphaële Xenidis: "Algorithmic Governance in Europe: Inside the Digital Machinery of Discrimination"
Blauwe zaal
This talk examines the rise of the digital welfare state in Europe and its implications for social justice, focusing particularly on the discriminatory mechanisms of algorithmic governance. While presented as tools for modernizing public administration and optimizing resource allocation, automated decision-making systems used in welfare programs often institutionalize exclusion, amplify existing inequalities, and erode fundamental rights. Drawing on cases from Europe, the talk highlights how semi-automated fraud detection systems operate opaquely and ineffectively, disproportionately targeting marginalized populations under the guise of efficiency and fraud prevention. Central to the argument is the application of an intersectional lens — rooted in Black feminist thought — which reveals how these systems perpetuate complex forms of discrimination along axes such as gender, race, disability, and economic status. The analysis critiques existing legal frameworks for failing to address systemic and intersectional forms of algorithmic discrimination and calls for a rethinking of legal interventions.
10.15 - 10:30
Coffee break
Voorhof/Senaatszaal
10.30 - 11:30
Lightning round 1
Blauwe Zaal
Exclusion or Efficiency: Understanding Perspectives about AI Ethics Among Charity Workers in the United Kingdom
Sakina Hansen
Bias in Intent Detection: A Dynamical Systems Perspective
Eduardo Sanchez-Karhunen
The epistemic dimension of algorithmic fairness: assessing its impact in innovation diffusion and fair policy making
Camilla Quaresmini
Anticipating Risks and Identifying Governance Measures for the Use of genAI and FPT: Citizens’ Perspectives Across Six Countries
Chiara Ullstein, Michel Hohendanner
Move forward or break ranks: Workshopping re-idealized explanation obligations to foster fundamental change and resistance to oppression
Aviva de Groot
Fake Transparency: When Mobile Apps Say One Thing but Do Another
Alejandro Pérez-Fuente
Medicine After Death: XAI and Algorithmic Fairness Under Label Bias Olalekan
Joseph Akintande
LLM's Pluralistic Compatibility
Severin Engelmann
Beyond Fairness: Trans Unliveability in European Algorithmic Assemblages
Christoffer Koch Andersen
11.30 - 12:30
In-depth session 1
Lecture Hall 4 and Lecture Hall 5
Lecture hall 4
Active Fourier Auditor for Estimating Distributional Properties of ML Models
Ayoub Ajarra
Stochastic Fairness Interventions Are Arbitrary
Philipp Wolf
Lecture hall 5
Harmful Impacts of ML: Empirically Triangulating the Concerns and Practices of Developers
Agathe Balayn
The Great Data Standoff: Researchers vs. Platforms under the Digital Services Act
Jacob van de Kerkhof
12.30 - 13:30
Lunch
Voorhof/Senaatszaal
13.30 - 14:30
Panel: "Algorithmic citizen profiling and risk-scoring in the welfare state: civil society perspectives and litigation"
Blauwe Zaal
Moderators: Doris Allhutter & Karolina Sztandar-Sztanderska
Panelists:
Bastien Le Querrec (La Quadrature du Net)
Soizic Penicaud (Observatory of Public Algorithms - Odap.fr)
Tijmen Wisman (Stichting Platform Bescherming Burgerrechten, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
Mateusz Wrotny (Panoptykon Foundation)
The introduction of algorithmic citizen profiling and risk-scoring for purposes such as welfare fraud detection and the allocation of social services has become a widespread practice across Europe. While governments, for instance, introduce laws that oblige social security bodies to prevent social fraud, civil society organizations, data journalists and researchers raise concerns that biased, non-transparent automated risk assessment and profiling affect citizens' privacy and social rights. NGOs demand insight into algorithmic practices used to segment access to welfare or to flag citizens in vulnerable life situations as potential fraudsters. In the Netherlands and France, NGOs and coalitions between data rights organizations, organizations representing disadvantaged groups and unions have taken legal action to defend equal access to social security and the right of citizens to social protection.
This panel brings together representatives from different organizations, interest groups and journalism to discuss how algorithmic systems affect data protection and social rights and to deliberate on strategies that have been successful in gaining transparency and organizing resistance. After the panel discussion, the audience is invited to join the exchange on cases and experiences from different national contexts. The aim of this interactive session is to facilitate a dialogue between the algorithmic fairness community, civil society groups and data journalists to fathom organizing within and across national contexts.
14.30 - 16:00
Interactive Sessions 1
Lecture Hall 4, Auditorium 12, Auditorium 13
Lecture hall 4
Fairness for whom? On the need for co-creative pathways in AI policy and research
Ilina Georgieva, Courtney Ford, Paul Verhagen
Auditorium 12
Data access through the Digital Services Act (DSA)
Emilie Sundorph, Joao Vinagre, Sophia Dietrich
Auditorium 13
Contribute to the technical specification for responsible use of risk profiling algorithms used by the Dutch government
Laura Muntjewerf, Willy Tadema
16.00 - 17:00
Poster session 1
Voorhof/Senaatszaal
Privilege Scores
Ludwig Bothmann
Overcoming Fairness Trade-offs via Pre-processing: A Causal Perspective
Charlotte Leininger
Stochastic Fairness Interventions Are Arbitrary
Philipp Wolf
Fairness in Social Influence Maximization via Optimal Transport
Giulia De Pasquale
Algorithmic Transparency: The EU Digital Services Act and Young People's Experiences of Online Platforms
Megan Nyhan
A Benchmark for Client-level Fairness in Federated Learning
Xenia Heilmann
It's complicated. The relationship of algorithmic fairness and non-discrimination regulations in the EU AI Act
Kristof Meding
Anticipating Risks and Identifying Governance Measures for the Use of genAI and FPT: Citizens’ Perspectives Across Six Countries
Chiara Ullstein, Michel Hohendanner
Ethical Implications of Mental Health Chatbots: Addressing Anthropomorphism, Deception, and Regulatory Gaps
Thomas Leis
Fake Transparency: When Mobile Apps Say One Thing but Do Another
Alejandro Pérez-Fuente
Medicine After Death: XAI and Algorithmic Fairness Under Label Bias
Olalekan Joseph Akintande
The Great Data Standoff: Researchers vs. Platforms under the Digital Services Act
Jacob van de Kerkhof
Underrepresentation, Label Bias, and Proxies: Data Bias Profiles for the EU AI Act and Beyond
Alessandro Fabris
Working with Intersectional Fairness: A Handbook for Scrum Teams
Eliza Hobo
is xAI generalizable?
Javier Bustos
Is software that is formally verified fair necessarily also genuinely fair?
Joost J. Joosten
BiMi Sheets: Information sheets for bias mitigation methods
MaryBeth Defrance
Two (un)fair scenarios: Administrative Automated Decision-Making in Formal versus Natural Language
Petia Guintchev Toneva
Analyzing the interplay between societal trends and socio- demographic variables with local pattern mining: Discovering exceptional trends in adolescent alcohol use in the Netherlands
Rianne M. Schouten
Probabilistic Circuits with Constraints
Soroush Ghandi
17.00 - 19:00
Welcome reception
Voorhof/Senaatszaal